Would you rather...(game)

[X-Gamer]

Just ask a question like would you rather become best friends with pigma or worst enemies with krystal?

The user below will choose one out of the option, then ask another question which repeats the cycle.

I'll use my example given up there ^ as my question. Feel free to give a reason if you want when you answer.

[Matrilwood]

I would rather break up with Krystal than even consider that swine a friend (No pun intended). He's a traitor. I'm Christian and in Christian mythology, Treason is the worst sin off all. (Your soul doesn't even go to hell, it just gets ripped to pieces and eaten) Just a bit of trivia for you.

Would you rather live a short life of luxury (Stuffing your face, dangerous sports, sitting in front of TV all day etc), or a long life of self preservation (Exercise, diets, watching what you eat, watching what you do, making sure your BMI is between 20 and 27 etc)?

[Showtime 1-1]

Short life, but not by your description of luxury. I'd want nothing more then to live to fly and fight. I'd rather die in a massive explosion in my fighter jet at age 25 then live carefully, without danger and risk, to be 80.

That being said, the ideal outcome would be to live through the danger and risk, then become a grumpy old man. I always wanted to be a grumpy old veteran...

Anyways, would you rather have advance notice about your death, or die suddenly without warning?

[Vy'drach]

Hmmm, tough choice, but I'd have to go with advance warning so that I could try to cram all that I could into my time left, and make preparations for that day.

Would you rather live in a plane of existence where everything was tailored to fit you, and you never had to do anything, or a place where you had to fight and claw for every meager scrap you get? And yes, this was from that Twilight Zone episode, but it is an intriguing prospect.

[Matrilwood]

The Bucket List is a perfect movie for this situation. (On knowing when your going to die)

I think I would prefer to fight to survive. I actually requested my family to let me die rather than send me to a nursing home, or if I end up on a machine, pull the plug. In the old country, when you got too senile you ran to the front line, guns blazing, killing off as many enemy soldiers as you could before you were shot, but unfortunately western society does not like that.

If you had a choice, would you rather live for-ever, and see everyone you love die, or die at 50?

[Asper Sarnoff]

If you mean that their lifes won't be shorter because of it, then I'll be egoistic and live forever. So that also future generations can benefit from my brilliant mind and overly inflated ego.

Next dilemma.

You and a friend are arrested by the police, believed to have comitted a serious crime. The police have insufficient evidence for a conviction, and, having separated both prisoners, visit each of them to offer the same deal. If one testifies (defects from the other) for the prosecution against the other and the other remains silent (cooperates with the other), the betrayer goes free and the silent accomplice receives the full 10-year sentence. If both remain silent, both prisoners are sentenced to only six months in jail for a minor charge. If each betrays the other, each receives a five-year sentence. Each prisoner must choose to betray the other or to remain silent. Each one is assured that the other would not know about the betrayal before the end of the investigation.

Would you betray your friend, or remain silent and risk a 10 year sentence if your friend is less noble than you.

[Guest DRL]

It depends on how 'much' he/she/it is my friend. If it is someone who I just meet, chances are that I will talk, mainly because I have no idea what the person would do.

If it is a long-term friend, then I am surely going to remain silent. However, if in the last case the 'friend' in question bretays me, I will wait the 10 years, but then I will go and hunt him/her/it down.

Phearps I will forgive him or her, but that would be a 'very' special case.

No real friend should bretay a friend, but that is just what I think...

In the above case, considering your friend bretayed you, what would you do?

Would you forgive him or her? or would track down and punish your friend ("somehow". Does not have to be death. Maybe extortion, hacking his/her financial account and steal all the money... ect.) for the his/her betrayal?

[Asper Sarnoff]

I'd be allmighty pissed if I had to stay in prison for ten years because of a so-called friend stabbed me in the back. It was the most logical choice for him/her if he/she wanted to avoid prison himself/herself, but would still be unacceptable in my book.

I'd hunt him/her down, and extract the punishment I'd saw fit.

Next dilemma. A more humorous one at that.

You're trapped up to your neck in a deep pit filled with excrements. You can't get up, or move from side to side.

A mortal enemy of yours walks up to the pit, grabbing a stone the size of a mans head and lifting it up, ready to throw it at you.

Do you take the stone to the head, or do you dive?

[Guest Julius Quasar]

Just ask a question like would you rather become best friends with pigma or worst enemies with krystal?

Best friends with Pigma...then I'd stab him in the back (in more ways than one) and rip him off!

"How do you like the ice!?  Now you know how James and Peppy felt!"

Would you rather live a short life of luxury (Stuffing your face, dangerous sports, sitting in front of TV all day etc), or a long life of self preservation (Exercise, diets, watching what you eat, watching what you do, making sure your BMI is between 20 and 27 etc)?

short life of luxury...I never wanna get old...I'd like to put a bullet into my brain at age 30 

Anyways, would you rather have advance notice about your death, or die suddenly without warning?

Advance notice!

If you had a choice, would you rather live for-ever, and see everyone you love die, or die at 50?

Die at 50

"Don't touch my stuff after I'm gone....it's all booby trapped!"

Next dilemma.

You and a friend are arrested by the police, believed to have comitted a serious crime. The police have insufficient evidence for a conviction, and, having separated both prisoners, visit each of them to offer the same deal. If one testifies (defects from the other) for the prosecution against the other and the other remains silent (cooperates with the other), the betrayer goes free and the silent accomplice receives the full 10-year sentence. If both remain silent, both prisoners are sentenced to only six months in jail for a minor charge. If each betrays the other, each receives a five-year sentence. Each prisoner must choose to betray the other or to remain silent. Each one is assured that the other would not know about the betrayal before the end of the investigation.

Would you betray your friend, or remain silent and risk a 10 year sentence if your friend is less noble than you.

Remain silent, then work on appeals while in the slammer, and sue the police and prison authorities and the state upon vindication.  I'd also sue my friend for betraying me.

In the above case, considering your friend bretayed you, what would you do?

Would you forgive him or her? or would track down and punish your friend ("somehow". Does not have to be death. Maybe extortion, hacking his/her financial account and steal all the money... ect.) for the his/her betrayal?

I'd get revenge on the friend, it would be like "The Count of Monte Cristo!" style revenge I'd take out on that backstabbing prick! >=]

Next dilemma. A more humorous one at that.

You're trapped up to your neck in a deep pit filled with excrements. You can't get up, or move from side to side.

A mortal enemy of yours walks up to the pit, grabbing a stone the size of a mans head and lifting it up, ready to throw it at you.

Do you take the stone to the head, or do you dive?

Dive! Dive! Dive! Awoooga! Awoooga!

You're already up to your neck in $h!t, what's a little more over your head?  "In for a penny, in for a pound!"  you'd sink over your head into it anyways after being bonked on the head by the rock

Next Dilemma:

What if you were offered $5,000,000 to assassinate a well beloved celebrity, and you found out that beloved celebrity is actually a complete jerk when you met him/her earlier, and....you'll get away with the murder, whoever paid you will ensure you won't get prosecuted...

Would you still carry out the deed? Or would you rather not?

[X-Gamer]

Nah. Killing someone because he/she's a jerk isn't a very good reason. Murdering overall isn't very good either. A life is worth more than $5,000,000

Next:

Would you rather get your arm chopped off or sacked reeeeeaaalllly hard in the private area?

[ThePointingMan]

Well, Arms are important in life, and so are bay's, but we got enough of those.

Would you rather be gummed to death by a very old lion, or eaten alive by ants?

Gummed meaning no teeth, trying it's hardest to chew you up even though it's weak and old and got no teeth.

[Matt Macdowel]

i would rather have chuck norris round kick me in the face 3 times before i admit 2012 is right

am i doing this right?

[Vy'drach]

You have to respond to the previous poster's question, Matt, not put a random answer in.

[Guest DRL]

Next dilemma. A more humorous one at that.

You're trapped up to your neck in a deep pit filled with excrements. You can't get up, or move from side to side.

A mortal enemy of yours walks up to the pit, grabbing a stone the size of a mans head and lifting it up, ready to throw it at you.

Do you take the stone to the head, or do you dive?

I could not do either because I would have already vomited to death.

Well, Arms are important in life, and so are bay's, but we got enough of those.

Would you rather be gummed to death by a very old lion, or eaten alive by ants?

Gummed meaning no teeth, trying it's hardest to chew you up even though it's weak and old and got no teeth.

I would rather be gummed to death, because if you think about it, there does exist a chance of escaping. Since the lion has no teeth, chances are it´s bites are not lethal. However it may claw me as I am trying to escape...

Next question. You are caugh into spying during a meeting of big game corps. After you are taken to some sort of cell, they present you with 2 options:

1) Take a pill that makes you forget everything you saw and hear during the last 48 hours and wake up in a random hotel.

2) Test a new "device" they have made. It is a prototype VR artifact that lets you get into a videogame world and, after a showdown with a characters, brings him/her/it to reality, should you leave said character in K.O. first. However, the character will fight like-to-death, and if YOU are left in K.O., you are absorbed into the corps. database and the corps can do anything they want with you, althrough chances are that they re-shape you bizarringly and appear as a semi-playable character. Considering the risk, would you still do this option? (I know I would  )

[Matrilwood]

I would do the fight with Krystal.

I know that; 1 I am stronger than Krystal and I know all her vulnerable spots (Don't ask) and 2 if I lost then I'd end up in StarFox, in which case I would kill Fox and take Krystal as my Queen.

Win win.

[X-Gamer]

I would do the fight with Krystal.

I know that; 1 I am stronger than Krystal and I know all her vulnerable spots (Don't ask) and 2 if I lost then I'd end up in StarFox, in which case I would kill Fox and take Krystal as my Queen.

Win win.

Question?

[Matrilwood]

Oh yeah... 

Would you rather, Krystal gets killed, or the StarFox series end entirely?

[Matt Macdowel]

You have to respond to the previous poster's question, Matt, not put a random answer in.

whoops sorry everyone =(

[Guest Julius Quasar]

Oh yeah... 

Would you rather, Krystal gets killed, or the StarFox series end entirely?

The Star Fox series ending entirely.  It can always come back.

Would you rather...

Harass and taunt a demon, and the demon can never retaliate, in any way, nor can he have any demons or the devil himself get revenge on you,

OR

Would you rather aid/assist an angel, even though that won't guarantee you a spot in heaven, or any other rewards?

[Asper Sarnoff]

The later option. Rather help than harass, no matter the outcome. Walking the line now on religious subjects. But I'm not a believing christian anyway. I don't care for Heaven nor Hell. What matters if I get my place in Valhalla.

Next dilemma:

In front of you lies 10 million dollars, free to take. But if you take them, someone you knows will die in the excact same moment as your fingers touch the bills. Not necesarily a friend, could just as well be someone you hate.

Do you take the money, or leave them?

[ThePointingMan]

I could not do either because I would have already vomited to death.I would rather be gummed to death, because if you think about it, there does exist a chance of escaping. Since the lion has no teeth, chances are it´s bites are not lethal. However it may claw me as I am trying to escape...

Next question. You are caugh into spying during a meeting of big game corps. After you are taken to some sort of cell, they present you with 2 options:

1) Take a pill that makes you forget everything you saw and hear during the last 48 hours and wake up in a random hotel.

2) Test a new "device" they have made. It is a prototype VR artifact that lets you get into a videogame world and, after a showdown with a characters, brings him/her/it to reality, should you leave said character in K.O. first. However, the character will fight like-to-death, and if YOU are left in K.O., you are absorbed into the corps. database and the corps can do anything they want with you, althrough chances are that they re-shape you bizarringly and appear as a semi-playable character. Considering the risk, would you still do this option? (I know I would  )

First thing, I said to gummed to DEATH, no chance of escape in either situation...

Anyways, I  would way rather go into a deathmatch with a character, pick someone I know I can beat, and then hey, Imma in a video game!

[Guest Julius Quasar]

Next dilemma:

In front of you lies 10 million dollars, free to take. But if you take them, someone you knows will die in the excact same moment as your fingers touch the bills. Not necesarily a friend, could just as well be someone you hate.

Do you take the money, or leave them?

(You kind of got that from that movie "The Box" )

Well, we're all gonna die one day anyways, and the odds of it being someone I hate are better than it being someone I don't hate, I hate 67% of the people I know, so I'd take the money.  I need that kinda money right now, considering my back is to the wall....I hope that the person who dies when I take it is my ex girlfriend!

Would you rather be blind, or a midget?

[Matrilwood]

A midget. Being a midget can be fun.

Would you prefer to be able to see into the future, or manipulate the past.

[Skye 66]

None. but if I have to then see to the future.

Would you rather live in darkness, without wind & nothing (like trees, grass etc) never moved & were colourless. or live in a world where you can never trust anyone. [i feel like this all the time, I can't trust my friends or family. Which is sad because I.. should.. be able to... trust them.] 

[Guest DRL]

First thing, I said to gummed to DEATH, no chance of escape in either situation...

Anyways, I  would way rather go into a deathmatch with a character, pick someone I know I can beat, and then hey, Imma in a video game!

Gummed to death, then.

And you are only absorbed into a game (any game) IF YOU are beaten.

Otherwise the guy/gal/thing you beaten comes to reality, and becomes real, and it´s yours.

I would do the fight with Krystal.

I know that; 1 I am stronger than Krystal and I know all her vulnerable spots (Don't ask) and 2 if I lost then I'd end up in StarFox, in which case I would kill Fox and take Krystal as my Queen.

Win win.

But you forgot about they being able to re-shape you to their likes, you becoming a semi-playable character, and you can actually appear in ANY game, since it´s after all a big corp. database. Say, you could end up being a mutant koopa in a Mario game...

But you could be lucky as well and it could happen what you said.

None. but if I have to then see to the future.

Would you rather live in darkness, without wind & nothing (like trees, grass etc) never moved & were colourless. or live in a world where you can never trust anyone. [i feel like this all the time, I can't trust my friends or family. Which is sad because I.. should.. be able to... trust them.] 

The later one. We already live in a world 'somewhat' similar to that, in fact.

Now the question:

You live in a world were 2 factions are in a cold war. Somehow, the nuclear holocaust begins, but shortly someone shows up to you and you are offered 2 options:

Go back to the past, and prevent the war and any futher wars in your world from starting (and thus saving a bazillion of lives and make a better world for future generations),

OR,

becoming the supreme leader of your world, whose authority is unquestionable, and also one of the most powerfull individuals in the galaxy.