EazyIN Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I say Assault. Good balance B/T on foot and plane missions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FoXXX Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Star Fox 64 is my favorite. I still play it regularly :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EazyIN Posted May 3, 2010 Author Share Posted May 3, 2010 I kinda wanna sell Command. IF I get Adventures. WICH I DOUBT WILL HAPPEN DKFJKSAJFI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"User" Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I kinda wanna sell Command. IF I get Adventures. WICH I DOUBT WILL HAPPEN DKFJKSAJFII didn't play Adventures until 6 years after it first came out. I ordered it online via Amazon for only $20, they got a lot of copies there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePointingMan Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Choosing between these games would be like choosing between... Your best friend and your other best friend...They are all so good, but currently I wanna play starfox(snes) the most, just because it's the only one I don't have access to... It fills my heart with sad tidings of not joy every day, when I remember that it's broken... and I can not play it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DRL Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Star Fox 64.The word "AWEcool"is too little for it.It is "AWE-OUT-OF-THIS-DIMENSION" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asper Sarnoff Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Star Fox 64. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlyJedi Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 StarFox Assault. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vy'drach Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 It was a tough choice between 64 and Assault, but I had to go with Assault, just because of Krystal. Ever since I rekindled my interest in Star Fox and Krystal, I haven't been able to enjoy SF64 as much as much due entirely to the absence of Krystal. (If only there was a way to mod it to put her in the game) Anyway, I'm sure the multiplayer of Assault would make it outrank 64 also, but I wouldn't know since I've never actually played it on MP for real, since I have no one to play it with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrypticQuery Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 SF64, no contest ! Although, Assault and the original trail extremely close behind. I'll be honest, I wasn't that much of a fan of Adventures, although it was pretty good. I HATE COMMAND, IT'S AN ABOMINATION TO STARFOX!! HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME Q-GAMES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FoXXX Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 SF64, no contest ! Although, Assault and the original trail extremely close behind. I'll be honest, I wasn't that much of a fan of Adventures, although it was pretty good. I HATE COMMAND, IT'S AN ABOMINATION TO STARFOX!! HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME Q-GAMES. 100% same :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Flare Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 My favourite is a tie between Adventures and Assault. Both delivered aspects of gaming that I enjoy - on-foot exploration (stemming from my love for the Zelda series) and a good bit of gunning down enemies. Adventures boasted some incredible graphics while Assault handled a bigger variety of gameplay. It's hard to choose between the two... And I actually enjoyed Command. Sure, I would have liked it more if it resulted in a single canon ending, but the tactical approach was pretty fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylum Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 Ok seriously? SFC was not that bad. Q-games gave the fans exatcly what they wanted. Tactical gameplay, branching stories, and a return to straight up fighter battles. Honestly it's not the best but it certainly isn't an abomination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DRL Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Ok seriously? SFC was not that bad. Q-games gave the fans exatcly what they wanted. Tactical gameplay, branching stories, and a return to straight up fighter battles. Honestly it's not the best but it certainly isn't an abomination.Well, I did not like it very much,and no offence but I was left witha taste of "empty" in my mouth...I mean, I did enjoyed it for a bit,but it got too repetitive quickly.Story aside, gameplay could havebeen better. The Stylus was a painto my hand, and I do mean it.All range mode for EVERY missiononly made it worse, because I hadto use the Stylus for ALMOST EVERYTHING.I mean, in 64, you made use of most, if not all,buttons and functions the controller had to offer,not a single button and a d-pad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FoXXX Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Ok seriously? SFC was not that bad. Q-games gave the fans exatcly what they wanted. Tactical gameplay, branching stories, and a return to straight up fighter battles. Honestly it's not the best but it certainly isn't an abomination.>Q-games gave the fans exactly what the wanted.>Branching storieslawlies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylum Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 I'm just saying. Apparently that's what certain fans who got through to them wanted and they rolled with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now